Wednesday, September 19, 2012

Lexie Kite, Ph.D. Communications Student and Co-Editor of Beauty Redefined, Salt Lake City

The minute I found Beauty Redefined, I knew I’d found a site to take notice of. Giving active points about media literacy, cultural messages aimed toward women, body image, and beauty ideals, every post on Beauty Redefined went beyond merely stating, Hey, folks, there’s a problem here, instead presenting airtight breakdowns of scripts we might take for granted. More important, the site gives active points for readers on how to begin to reject the messages we’re surrounded with. The Beauty Redefined team also gives one-hour visual presentations to arm viewers with tools and countermessages about harmful media ideals, beauty, and health.

When I learned that the incisive, dedicated, laser-sharp minds behind Beauty Redefined were not only two communication Ph.D. candidates at the University of Utah but also identical twins—well, how could I not want to interview them? Today we have Lexie Kite, whose dissertation focuses on women and self-objectification. (Read the interview with Lindsay, the other half of Beauty Redefined, here.) We talked about internalizing the male gaze, twins as mirrors, and prime-time pornography. In her own words:



On Self-Objectification 
When you grow up in a media-oriented world, like we all have, you grow up with the male gaze: the look of the camera, the look of the spectator viewing the object of the gaze on film. It’s the way the camera pans up and down these bodies, the way the dialogue revolves around that woman. It doesn’t happen with men—it happens with women, for the most part. That has become so normalized that the male gaze is now internalized by women. It’s not even something we question. So what’s happened is that now it’s desirable to not only become the object of the gaze—I mean, we’ve been talking forever about this idea of objectification—but also to be the subject too. To be the one who gazes and the one being gazed upon at the same time. I think it really comes down to the fact that when we see this many images of women’s bodies signifying sex and power, we are cut down to our bodies—and somehow we begin to believe that’s true. Self-objectification is just the natural next step—the most harmful natural next step. When we are consumers of women, we are consumers of ourselves.

One of the areas where I see self-objectification playing out—and one that I think is so frustrating—is Victoria’s Secret. Five billion dollars a year! It’s powerful. I got interested in the industry of Victoria’s Secret because I was a shopper there; the semi-annual sale was very appealing. But then I’d get those catalogues in my mailbox, and I started seeing images that were pretty jarring. Then I caught wind of the fashion show they have twice a year on CBS, so I looked into how many people are viewing this show, how popular and powerful Victoria’s Secret really is. I found one other scholar who has really talked about this, and the stuff she said about Victoria’s Secret in her own historical and critical analysis was that those images were women’s pornography. Images of women, marketed to women, packaged and sold. It comes right into your home. It’s kind of like the Sports Illustrated swimsuit issue, in that it’s the most popular, credible sports magazine, and then once a year we get this other thing that is packaged in this way and sits on your coffee table. So you think it’s safe, but it might not be as safe as we think. In terms of Victoria’s Secret, I see that playing out, this idea that it’s just lingerie, but you’re really getting something else.

The Victoria’s Secret mission statement has said that these images are about women feeling good about themselves. They are not for men to look at. But if you look at the images, it couldn’t be anything more than what the male gaze is. It’s as graphic as anything you would see in soft-core porn—it’s just women pulling at their underwear or being naked. They can be completely naked some of the time and they are wearing thongs that say “All-Night Show.” But Victoria’s Secret says this is not for men to look at, this is for you to feel good—and we believe that. Maybe we don’t even think of it as a contradiction, like this is for us to feel good about ourselves, but that says self-objectification to me. To me self-objectification is the idea of taking some beauty thing—let’s say breast implants—and saying, “This isn’t for men—this is for me to feel good about myself.” I see that as the literal embodiment of self-objectification, internalizing that male gaze so much that you can’t even break apart the fact that being gazed upon is your greatest desire. You’ve internalized that male gaze, so that’s how you feel good about yourself. It’s crazy stuff. 

On Pain 
I was very confident in my abilities in high school—I was class president every year, was nominated for homecoming queen, I was always running assemblies. I was confident in what I could do and what I wanted to say. But somehow I lived this contradiction: I could do a lot, but for some reason I thought I couldn’t be everything that I was supposed to be, and couldn’t look good doing it. That was internalizing the male gaze, right there: I learned that it was all about how I looked and not about what I could do. So I was confident in who I was as a person; it really did just come down to the looks thing. All those messages that I heard from the media were telling me that if I wasn’t hot enough, I wasn’t good enough. And if I wasn’t going to get to that place of feeling like I really was good enough, nobody can. It’s unattainable, and I don’t think I really knew that. You’re never going to be pretty enough. You’re never going to be skinny enough. Because the whole point is that these messages are telling you that you need to be someone you’re not. It creates a void. I didn’t even know that I had that void, not until I took a class on media criticism my freshman year of college. We were looking into pop culture and how powerful those industries are and what kind of messages they are putting out. I felt my heart beat more rapidly because I was hearing stuff that resonated with what I’d come to think about myself in really harmful ways. For the first time I started being able to critically think about the messages I’d heard. They didn’t necessarily pertain to my reality—but I wanted them to so badly.

I’m a body image activist and I’m so passionate about this stuff, but it’s because of the pain I’ve felt. I know that pain brings progress. I can’t do this work without having been privy to intimately knowing the reason it resonates with people. They feel this pain too. I internalized this gaze, and I didn’t know how to articulate that—maybe that’s just because it’s so normal and so lived. It’s how most of us live our lives. But our research has helped me profoundly. I had been walking through life picturing myself from an outsider’s perspective. I’d taken less time to enjoy what was around me, yet it looks like I’m enjoying what’s around me. That division is so harmful. 

On Being a Twin 
Most of us view ourselves from an outsider’s gaze. But I don’t even really know how to think about that, because—maybe it’s the same thing as viewing myself from an outsider’s gaze, but in ways I view myself as being like Lindsay. Lindsay and I are especially hyperaware of competition. We’re such similar people—you know, identical DNA, as similar as you get!—and people put us in competition against each other, in conscious and unconscious ways. In terms of our looks—in terms of everything else too—but it definitely made me aware of my own features and my own looks, because I feel like Lindsay is a reflection of me to the world. I know she feels the same. I feel like I want Lindsay to represent me well. Because Lindsay could easily be me to people; we get called by the wrong name still, even in our own program at school. So I want her to be a good reflection of me. And yeah, that part of me is really aware.

Whenever I’d picture my face, I never thought Lindsay and I looked the same. I know the intricacies of my own face and what makes me different from her. Plus, being twins, people point out that stuff like crazy. So Lindsay looks different to me, but I get how people know we’re twins, especially when I see pictures of us. With the body it’s different. When we look at ourselves in the mirror we’re kind of seeing this two-dimensional image of our bodies; we’ve never getting the full feel. It’s why when you see a video of yourself it can be intriguing—you want to know what you look like from all those angles. So I can see Lindsay’s body—I can see her from every angle and it’s normal. She’s right there in front of me, in every dimension. It’s sort of a mediation of my mirror image and myself, and I can’t get that body perspective any other way. And then of course we have identical DNA, and people tell us we look so much alike—so even though I think our faces look different, I can internalize her body as my own. Sometimes I’ve pictured my body how Lindsay’s is; my body image becomes what Lindsay looks like. When her body changes, it can actually change my own image of my body, because she looks how I picture myself. And having someone else sort of be your body image can be a struggle.

My perception of my body image doesn’t have to do with size necessarily. Despite compliments I might get from people, it’s really about what I’m saying to myself. Body image is an internal thing. Lindsay has been able to brush off the negative messages better than I have, despite our similar appearances. To hear Lindsay value herself and not engage in fat talk, and just really refuse to be preoccupied with these notions about our bodies—it’s really helped me, just seeing her be positive. We don’t talk a lot about our bodies to each other—there isn’t a lot of that “Oh my gosh I feel so gross,” talk, and we don’t even do a lot of building each other up, because we’re such a unit that it feels weird. Like, I would never say, “Linds, you look so good!” I mean, occasionally, but that’s just not my first thing. I’m not going to just go to her and talk about her appearance. I don’t even know how to explain that because I’ve never known it any other way. Twins are weird!

___________________________________
For more interviews on beauty, click here.

10 comments:

  1. this was incredible to read, particularly on self-objectification!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Zoe, when I was talking with Lexie about self-objectification I think *I* got some of that "rapid-heartbeat moment" that both she and Lindsay describe! Thank you for reading.

      Delete
  2. Great article but don't forget who the editors of the women's trash mags are that objectify women...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dave, I'm not sure what you're getting at--that it's women (not men?), or that it's people like me (who worked in the industry)? I don't think that the individual editors are to blame here; I think it's a larger systemic problem. I thought I'd enter the industry and be the only feminist there--imagine my surprise when I found that was hardly the case!

      Delete
  3. Wow.... :|
    That paragraph on pain was amazing! I felt like I was reading my own story... I've been struggling with depression for years feeling so completely inadequate. Feeling that I never could (or can) be good enough. I thought it developed over 14 years of working with all males. Dave its irrelevant what sex the editors are, the fact is that there is a huge increase in body image disorders for women and something needs to be done about it

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Kim, I'm so glad to read that you got something out of this interview--yes, depression definitely plays a part in these issues, and it's a symbiotic relationship. Which starts first? Hard to say. Thank you for reading!

      Delete
  4. I absolutely love this!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  5. 8 Of The 11 Forgotten Laws

    The Legislation of Forgiveness is among Nike Shox the eleven forgotten laws put together by Bob Women Air Max 90 Proctor. Proctor himself abides by these laws and is thought to evangelise his beliefs to Nike Free 3.0 V2 others across the world. Inserting the blame on one other or oneself takes a number of energy and vitality away from the person doing the blaming. Proctor Nike Lunar suggests that individuals ought to abide by the Regulation of Forgiveness and use their energy to forgive and find a technique to proper the scenario instead. This helps the particular person Nike Zoom KD 6 Kids to move ahead with their lifeAlthough Proctor urges folks to forgive, he does not urge individuals to carry again from taking a stand or standing up for themselves. By no means does he Nike Free 4.0 V2 mean to let someone stroll throughout an individual or not converse up when they are harm or triggered harm by another. Human beings are emotional and it is unhealthy to keep all these feelings in whether or not they are good or bad. It is much simpler to forgive a person that unintentionally harm one other and worked Nike Free Powerlines to help fix the situation. If a person is deliberately hurt by another they should forgive them and not dwell on the situation. Dwelling on a situation Nike Shox retains an individual from shifting on which can solely harm them more within the long run. As an alternative, an individual ought to forgive for the sake of shifting on but never forget. This fashion the particular person can shield themselves from being damage by this individual againForgiving oneself is simply as important. Folks have to forgive themselves for the honest errors they have made Nike Free 3.0 V3 and if they are a bad person, must change and change into a new and higher person whereas leaving the bad within the past. Folks can profit in two methods by leaving the previous within the past. Previous experiences should educate people a lesson. A very good experience creates fond recollections and is something to look again on. A bad expertise is one that needs Sneaker Online to be learned from and never repeated. Mainly, the Regulation of Forgiveness means forgiving oneself and others for flawed doings that are each intentional and unintentional. One ought to forgive however never forgetIt focuses on allowing people to really believe that they are capable of more than they think they are.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Five Quick Tips To Increase Your Height

    Your clothing Jordan Spizike can have a significant effect on how tall you look. As a rule, vertical stripes help you look taller as well as leaner. Thus, by shirts and trousers with pinstripes. These Nike Air Max 90 Hyperfuse Womens are also very much in fashion these days.

    Also, wear solid colors all over preferably in darker shades. Light pants over dark shirts, or vice versa, draw attention to your waist and legs, givin you a short, stodgy appearance. This is the reason why you'll rarely find shorter celebrities wearing light clothing.

    It's pretty obvious: your shoes can add a significant inch or two to your height. Avoid shoes without any heels. The standard Converse Chucks have a sole that's just 0.45 inches thick, as compared to the 1.5 inch+ of the Nike Shox. It makes sense then, to wear shoes that help you look taller.

    Another method to make yourself look taller is through height enhancing insoles. These fit right inside the shoe and can add an inch or two to your height, without being outwardly visible. You can also buy pre made elevator shoes, although then Nike Air Max TN Mens you'll be limited to the designs that the shoe company makes. To carry off insoles of over an inch, you'll require boots.

    Measure yourself first thing when you wake up in the morning. Then measure yourself Nike Air Max 2015 Couple before going to bed. You'll be surprised to find that in the morning, you're as much as an inch taller than in the evening.

    This happens because due to gravity, the spine gets compressed, which leads to a decrease in height. If you have a bad posture (stooped shoulders, slouched back), the spinal column compresses even more, giving you an even shorter appearance.

    Thus, one way to make yourself look Air Max 90 taller is by maintaining a proper posture. This Nike Air Max 2014 Womens means that you should keep your back straight, your shoulders drawn back, and your head lifted. Believe me, by adopting such a "military stance", you'll not only appear taller, but also much more confident.

    ReplyDelete