Monday, March 12, 2012

A Humble Plea

Love on the rocks.

I don’t share much about my romantic life here. This isn't necessarily by design; my gentleman friend doesn’t mind when I write about him, as he trusts I wouldn’t write anything about him that would make him uncomfortable or violate his—our—privacy. It’s more that the issued that would be relevant to write about here as far as our relationship—say, the keen desire to be desired, sometimes specifically for how I look, and how that plays out between two people who give a good deal of thought to authenticity and representation in relationships of all sorts—are things I’m still wrestling with. I frequently figure things out through writing about them, but that can be dangerous in a number of ways when the “thing” in question is another person, one you care about immensely. The end result—at this point, anyway—is that while the role of romance in beauty is hardly verboten from The Beheld, its presence is far less frequent than one might imagine.

So what I’m about to ask is, like, totally unfair. I’m working on a project (related to but separate from this blog) in which I need to hear from a lot of women about looks, appearance, and being seen—specifically, how those things play into dating and relationships. I’ll be making similar pleas in the future but for now I’m looking to talk with women about the role appearance, beauty, and the wish to be seen (or not seen) has played out in their romantic relationships and dating life. I’m not looking for any particular type of woman—in fact, I’m looking for a diverse range of people to talk with. The only requirement is that you consider yourself a woman.

If you’re interested in talking with me about how looks have played into your romantic life, please drop me an e-mail at the.beheld.blog at gmail dotcom; I’ll send you a few questions and we’ll go from there. Sound good? All responses will be confidential.

9 comments:

  1. I consider myself a woman, AND I'm on spring break. You'll hear from me soon.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If I did emoticons, now might be the time I'd do one in, and it would be a smiley face.

      Delete
  2. Replies
    1. Terri, I haven't actually received it yet--not sure if you got distracted or if it got lost. Just DM'd you on Twitter--no worries if you're unable to do it for any reason! I'd love whatever input you have to offer.

      Delete
  3. I saw this post the same day you posted it and meant to respond. If you still need to hear from women, I would be happy to answer questions. Should I post my email here?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Obama's last-minute decision to seek congressional authorization alone
    Attitudes change
    Obama earlier this week from two major changes: one is the Chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff Martin

    Dempsey will reaffirm against Syria, 'the time is not a problem,' followed by British Nike Free Run Roshe Run Homme Prime Minister David Cameron lost a parliamentary vote at a meeting, Dempsey say to Obama impressed: a military strike is not time important. Dempsey told Obama, whether a military strike is tomorrow, a week later or a month later, the US military to ensure the efficiency of military action. In Saturday's meeting, Dempsey reiterated this view on Thursday Cameron lost the landmark parliamentary vote, the White House officials have been warning not to underestimate the anti-war sentiment, both in the United Kingdom or the United States US time on August 30, its chief of staff Denis Obama

    McDonough walk 45 minutes to make a decision on the White House South Lawn, he told McDonough told Congress just is not enough, lawmakers are responsible for their vote. He then convened a senior adviser in the Oval Office to meet in 19:00. In the next two hours, they discussed Obama's decision, some Nike Air Max 95 360 Homme of Burberry Trench Coats the advisers warned that the move risks Obama made clear at the meeting that the final decision is Nike Air Max 97 Homme Burberry Sling Bags ultimately advisers agreed at the meeting, Obama told aides he enough Burberry Coats lawmakers performance, they look you want to have it both ways, while criticizing the president did not seek congressional authorization, followed by criticism of his decision to make. Officials believe that Obama wants to force Congress to make decisions, so that lawmakers and the president would have to bear the same pressure Bloomberg quoted sources as saying that Obama's move Designer Burberry Outlet to seek congressional authorization has multiple benefits: to enhance the credibility of US military action to For more information about the American people, let Congress take on more responsibility, so Obama from political criticism and strengthen long-term goal of US 911 from a state of war since the get out. Syria postponed against Obama can use this week's G20 meeting to win more state support for US military operations but the gambling WSJ believe that Obama is also a great risk, first into a split Congress might eventually reject a military strike, The US Middle East ally, warned the White House not as likely to encourage Assad and his closest ally of Iran and Hezbollah Obama's move is a bet Congress will eventually authorized the use of force, and assuming the Syrian army not to use it a delayed launch a new round of CW attack or other military strikes. US Congress to Burberry Swimwear go to Sept. Nike Site Officiel 9 to discuss the issue. If any of the above premise final mistake, Obama did not rule out the possibility of launching its own attack. Obama Nike Air Max 2011 Femme and his advisers made it clear that the president did not give up at any time, even if Congress rejected believe, Obama also has the right to continue.

    ReplyDelete