Monday, November 12, 2012

On Veterans Day

"Nicky," Here Are the Young Men, Claire Felicie, 2009–2010

When I write here of beauty, most of the time I’m actually writing of convention—of what we as a culture have given our stamp of approval in the realm of beauty. The point isn’t any person’s actual appeal; the point is the standards and parameters we create around beauty.

But the way I experience beauty in my day-to-day life is personal, not sociological. When I register someone as beautiful—that is, when a person shows up on my radar as you should continue to look—it’s because of a quality the person has. A flicker in the eyes, a smirk, the way the person moves. That sounds vague because it is vague, it has to be vague, because if it were charted and fully understood, it might lose its properties of fascination. Beauty’s ineffability is part of what makes it register to us as beauty.

It's that elusive transcendence—which may or may not be beauty—that comes to mind with Claire Felicie’s remarkable photographs of soldiers taken before, during, and after their tours of Afghanistan, titled Here Are the Young Men. If you saw these photographs absent of context, some of them might have that sort of unclassifiable but intriguing quality about them to you; others wouldn’t. But when you learn that these were taken before, during, and after a life-changing experience that most of us will thankfully never know for ourselves, other qualities leap forward. Aversion, deadening, patience, cynicism, hatred, weariness, reluctance: The photos reflect something more complex than a mere loss of innocence. The phrase “the fog of war” refers to the shrouding of facts, evidence, and ability to determine the best course of action that something as extraordinary as war brings. I think of it here because of these men’s faces: You can’t look at them and draw any sort of universal conclusion. Some men look like the grew into themselves during their tour, a sort of adultness settling across their face. Other men, afterward, are unable to look into the camera. There’s no one way to know how war will change any individual, or any nation.

These photos also call into focus the fluctuating gap between what we really see and what we expect to see, both 
overshadowed by our knowledge that predetermination will change what we see. As Heather Murphy writes on Slate’s photo blog, “[T]here is something else in that third picture; a dullness to the eyes, a stiffness to the jaw. Isn’t there? What’s interesting about this project is that you can convince yourself that someone changed dramatically from middle to right, only to compare right to left and talk yourself out of it. It must just be angle or lighting, you say.” Yet Murphy reaches the same conclusion I do: “But even after you’ve concluded that wrinkle isn't really any bigger, it's undeniable that there is a difference. … It's not about the obvious clues like a frown or matted hair, but something far more nuanced.”

This can be applied in a far broader context: How our assumptions regarding people’s experiences color how we visually perceive them. Those broader applications are worth looking at, but today, for once I’m not thinking of how to make these questions bigger. I’m thinking of the soldiers—the veterans—and their before, during, and after. Whatever any of us may think of the war in Afghanistan, these people were there fulfilling their duty—as many of our parents did in Vietnam, our grandparents in WWII, our great-grandparents in the Great War that made the eleventh day of the eleventh month a global call for peace, and a global remembrance of those who served. I don’t want to glorify war or its participants by commenting upon Veterans Day. But an honoring needn’t be one of glorification; it can be an honoring of experience. And today, we honor just that.

12 comments:

  1. Thanks for sharing that photo project. I was blown away but just what you talked about...the gentleness of the differences. Wow.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I thought at first glance that was 3 different people. Really amazing and thought provoking!

    ReplyDelete
  3. I can comment from my PC! Just not my mac.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I'm now not sure the place you are getting your information, but good topic. I must spend a while finding out more or understanding more. Thank you for fantastic information I used to be searching for this info for my mission.

    ReplyDelete
  5. FIFA World Cup Draws Attention To Classic Sportswear Battle

    Last Friday's draw for the 2014 FIFA World Cup in Brazil starts a new chapter in the rivalry between Nike (NYSE:NKE) and Adidas (OTCQX:ADDYY), the number one and two sportswear manufactures in the world. Adidas is the official sponsor of the FIFA World Cup while Nike sponsors the home playing squad of Brazil. Adidas and Nike are well represented in the top 10 contenders for the FIFA World Cup, according to the bookmakers (see graph below). Both Adidas and Nike sponsor 4 teams out of the top 10 favorites for the World Cup title. Nike sponsors the number one favorite Brazil and several small favorites like the Netherlands, France and England. However, it will be tough to compete with Nike's stars like Neymar (Brazil), Ronaldo (Portugal) and Van Persie (Netherlands). In addition, Nike has the home playing advantage because the company sponsors Brazil, the host nation. The Brazilian national soccer jersey is already the best selling jersey around the world and sales will probably peak in the weeks around to the start of the FIFA World Cup. On the other hand, Adidas has high expectations of sales from the official FIFA World Cup merchandise, like the official match Nike Air Max 2011 ball "Brazuca."

    PerformanceNike has Adidas currently under attack in its home Nike Air Max 2014 Womens market, western Europe. Adidas just managed to stay in front of Nike, according to data from Euromonitor. In 2012, Nike reported a 12.4% market share in western Europe compared to a 13.2% market share for Adidas. This trend continued during the latest quarter in 2013. Nike reported an 8% rise in western Europe sales during their fiscal first quarter, ended on August 31. ValuationAdidas' earnings per share are more dependent on events like the FIFA World Cup than Nike's earnings per share. Therefore, analysts expect that Adidas will report a stronger growth in earnings per share Nike Air Max 90 next year compared to Nike. I compared the two companies trailing P/E ratio and forward P/E ratio (see table Nike Air Max 90 87 Womens below). The data show that Adidas has a 20% lower trailing and forward P/E valuation than Nike. In my opinion, the difference in valuation between Nike and Adidas expresses Nike's innovative edge, its better diversified marketing strategy and its favorable long term growth potential compared to Adidas. At this Nike Air Max 90 87 Womens point I favor Nike over Adidas, despite the fact that Adidas is cheaper in terms of trailing and forward P/E ratios and provides a higher dividend yield. I have more confidence in Nike's well diversified marketing strategy. Adidas has a strong focus on soccer marketing and therefore earnings are more dependent on events like the FIFA World Cup compared to Nike. Nike has also the home team advantage next year, which should be a strong support for Nike's Brazilian jersey sales. Further, I have more confidence in Nike's ability to be innovative. Adidas seems to be one step behind Nike. For example, Adidas introduced its running watch quite late after Nike released its first running watch.

    Disclosure: I have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article Air Max 90 myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

    ReplyDelete