Monday, March 28, 2011

Thoughts Upon Reading 122 Comments About My Face, Courtesy America Online

"Your story is being considered to be featured on AOL Welcome Screen!" my editor at MyDaily wrote me in regards to the piece I wrote about my makeover. "If it happens, you will get TONS of traffic. Yay! But be ready for crazy comments."

I wouldn't say that the comments were crazy (with the exception of "I would eat her with a spoon"). But when I was notified that it had gone into rotation and saw more than 100 comments within mere hours, I was both thankful to my editor for her prescience (word up, Ellen!) and interested in what this sample of people might illuminate about our culture's attitudes toward beauty. I sometimes fall into the pop-feminist bubble (I remember being shocked when a friend told me he hadn't read much discussion of Natalie Portman's ballerina-fied body in Black Swan, whereas that was pretty much the only thing I read about the film), so I was curious to see what a cross-section of Americans who are Online might have to say about my piece. And, of course, I never found out: They were too busy talking about my face instead.

What I learned from 122 comments about my face:

1) People overwhelmingly preferred the "before" me: “I agree with everyone else the before picture is better than the bombshell photo. ; )”

I prefer the "natural" me too, for that matter—I loved the bombshell look and found it fun, and thought Eden did a fantastic job of creating the look. But I wasn’t doing the makeover to look better; I was doing it to look different, and both my makeover guru and I approached it with that mind-set. And, sure, it's nice to hear that Online Americans don’t think I need a pile of false eyelashes to look nice. (You like me! You really like me!) I admit it's also a relief. (Still, I stand by certain tricks I learned. Eyebrow pencil! Lipstick!)

Aside from that—and aside from the unfortunate difference in lighting between the two photos, which ensured that my “before” has a naturally-lit quality that the “after” couldn’t achieve—I found it interesting that, in fact, only four commenters flat-out said that I looked better afterward. Is it only a straw man who prefers artifice? And was there an element of self-congratulation among some commenters? It’s easy to be drawn to certain signals of beauty: red lipstick, emphasized eyes, long curls. Therefore, it’s easier to reject those signals as false, vain, trying too hard. Yet we all know what those signals mean, so I wonder if some commenters thought that they were seeing beyond the surface by preferring the more low-key look presented in the “before” picture. To reject my utterly normal-looking, friendly-seeming “before” picture would be more akin to rejecting a person, not the symbols presented in the “after”—and while anonymous online commenters aren’t known for their social graces, neither are people usually out to merely be mean. (Of course, plenty of commenters were just that, but they’re easy enough to discount.)

2) The catch-all insult: “got 2 mention nose job.”

A handful of commenters indicated that I needed a nose job. Whaaaa? I have the most average nose in North America. I mean, am I deluding myself here in that there is absolutely nothing remarkable about my nose? (Okay, I do have a bump from a reconstruction after a car wreck when I was 16, but you can only see it from the side.) What this indicates to me is that “you need a nose job” is a grab bag of ways to put a woman in her place. It makes me think of the time a random man on the subway suddenly started yelling at me about how fat I was. It wasn’t that I was fat (I’ve got a medium build), nor was it even that he thought I was fat, I’m guessing—it was that he was putting me in my place for not encouraging his advances. You can’t see my body in the shot that was on the page, and telling a woman she needs a nose job is vaguely the facial equivalent of “fat”: It’s a catch-all way of saying, There is something wrong with you, even if there isn’t. (And not that being fat or having a nose that is the stuff of magnificence is “wrong,” but some people treat it that way.) I’m not everyone’s cup of tea, but neither is there an odd-looking feature about me that’s so outstanding as to become the butt of commenters' jokes. So: nose job it is.

3) Total strangers could tell I'm uncomfortable in front of a camera: “She would be prettier in each picture if she had actually smiled rather than pursed her lips.”

It’s humbling to be called out on your “photo face” by total strangers. (A number of people commented that I looked pinched, uncomfortable, or “like she’s sucking a lemon.”) After interviewing photographer Sophie Elgort, I had to own up to the fact that if I’m trying to “look pretty” in a photograph, it will kill any chance I have of looking pretty. As Sophie said, “How can you expect to look like your best self in a photo if you’re putting on a ridiculous face?” To see that total strangers could pick up on my discomfort was an official notice that I’m not fooling anyone when I pout-smile in front of the camera. Smile and breathe. Smile and breathe.

4) People were quick to point out that, no, I didn't look like a bombshell: “We have very different definitions of 'bombshell'”

Some commenters meant this is a put-down (“More dud than bombshell,” courtesy icebull), but others just seemed mildly perplexed. I realize that a look that’s over-the-top to me is tame by many standards ("I'd like for you to visit Tuscaloosa on a nice fall Saturday—chances are there's more bombshells walking around there than where you're from,” writes DC). Perhaps the word conjures something that I didn’t intend; I forget that not everybody scrutinizes words the way I do. But from my perspective, the whole point of the bombshell is that it’s a creation, not a God-given quality. (Norma Jeane, anyone?) So when commenters wrote along the lines of, "She's just wearing lipstick and eyeliner! Where's the bombshell?" I wondered what they were hoping to see. Did they expect something more over-the-top? A different look entirely? A professional-level photo? Someone who is flat-out more beautiful than I could ever be?

Or was it that the term is so loaded that it can’t help but disappoint? We’re saturated with images of professional beauties everywhere, and those images are always digitally manipulated. I wonder if some users who saw the “bombshell” promise on their welcome screens, upon scrolling over my “before” picture and then finding a non-airbrushed, non-professional picture of a non-model—that is, an average woman who has been promoted as a “bombshell”—simply felt ripped off.

Listen, I don’t think I’m some exquisite orchid, but I can look in the mirror and see that I’m not “horrifying,” as one commenter wrote. I’m guessing that the people who were eager to put me down were doing so because through the construction of the headline, the “grand reveal” drag-and-scroll rollover of my before and after, and the very idea of the piece, I was claiming “bombshell” status for myself, however temporarily. It was that claim that provoked a response, not how I actually looked. In the days following Elizabeth Taylor’s death, I had a handful of conversations with friends who said something along the lines of “She’s pretty, sure, but why was she known as a great beauty?” None of the people who said this to me are the type to just randomly detract from someone’s looks: They were saying it in response to the sudden hyperconsciousness of a woman who has readily been called the most beautiful woman in the world. Of course they were going to look at that claim critically—and when you're using that rubric, Elizabeth freakin’ Taylor can fall short. Once I asked readers to take me in as a bombshell, how could I stand a chance of escaping the same?

5) Few people read a single word I wrote: “She was so excellent at playing Cleopatra that the world later really thought that Cleopatra was actually white. God Bless and Rest in Peace.”

Which is to say: Few appeared to have read the piece itself. The grand total of people who referenced anything other than my photo? Thirteen. (That’s excluding friends and readers of The Beheld who commented to help promote the piece—thank you!) Of those, maybe five actually addressed the points I was attempting to make. I can’t really get up in arms about this: It is a piece about my appearance, after all; referencing my looks in the comments isn't irrelevant. But nowhere did I say in the piece that I thought I looked better in either photo, and for a piece about getting a makeover, it was as far away from “which is better?” as you could get.

But none of that matters, because nobody was reading. I'm recalling an anecdote I didn't have room for in my interview with artist and writer Lisa Ferber: She was nervous while preparing to share one of her short stories at a reading. "My mother asked me if I was nervous about the piece, and I said, 'No, I'm nervous that I just won't be a good reader.' And she said, 'Lisa, you are a beautiful woman—nobody is going to listen to a word you say anyway.'" We both laughed when she shared the story, but it stuck with me. I’ve seen plenty of women be underestimated because they’re pretty, but I’ve always assumed that because I’m neither glorious nor hideous, it didn’t apply to me.

What I learned with this piece was that being objectified isn’t about whether a woman is pretty. It’s about her being an object—which is mighty hard to escape if you’re a woman, regardless of your appearance. In this case, the subject matter served as an ersatz carte blanche for people to openly discuss my looks, but it’s not hard to think of examples where the subject matter was entirely incongruent with a woman’s looks and people took aim anyway. (The 2008 elections come to mind.) I can’t imagine that people would have read the piece any more closely if I’d been outrageously weird-looking, or that fewer people would have read it if I were more conventionally beautiful. It was that I was a woman, and that I was there.


  1. God so interesting what happens when you put yourself out there. I have been trying to comment on your blog for awhile now (to let you know that I linked and loved your Liz Taylor story and others), but for some reason it has not been working. Looks like it is now. Let's get together when I get back to NYC in April. x

  2. I too tried to post earlier...but it wasn't working, so I gave up. Now I forget what I said...something like, "cool." But a lot wordier.

  3. Darnit! Thanks for alerting me about the comments issue.

    Megan, totally! Can't wait to see you!

  4. Well stated! Objectification isn't about beauty and it isn't reserved for those deemed "attractive." It's the way women (most often) are diminished to parts and now we've learned to do it to ourselves. It is so common and acceptable that we most don't even question it. I'm glad you are! You're a brave woman! Keep up the excellent work!

  5. Thank you for reminding us about the nature of objectification. It's troubling how quickly we find ourselves in that judging role, and how liberating it can feel to do the objectifying. Just the other day, a secretary noticed I lost some weight, and then added that the hips area is problematic for her, too. Feeling a bit paranoid, but...I certainly was not ready to have that information volunteered. On the other hand, why am I such a willing object?

  6. Anonymous Apple, it can be difficult to step out of that role, given that we've been in it since pretty much day one. Certainly those of us who are actively aware of the problems with objectification and who consciously work against it have a leg up--but even the most diligent of us have a difficult time not falling into that role sometimes. There's a difference between active will and passive will, and the latter is more difficult to eradicate.

    (Also: I peeked at your profile, Queens in the house! I've lived in Astoria for 11 years.)

  7. Hello, i am glad to read the whole content of this blog and am very excited and happy to say that the webmaster has done a very good job here to put all the information content and information at one place. Agen Ibcbet

  8. You should comment on the competition comparison of the blog. You can highlight it's mind boggling. Your blog exploration/tour will broaden your conversions.

  9. This is a fantastic website and I can not recommend you guys enough. Full of useful resource and great layout very easy on the eyes.

  10. 5 Cool And Amazing Science Fair Project Ideas

    To get an A+ in the science fair: Choose among these 5 science projects: How fruits and vegetables ripen, oil slick, salt volcano, homemade Nike Air Jordan Mens barometer, and got gas.

    The annual science fair is fast approaching. Surely you want to present something new and cool that would surely impress your science teachers and can help you earn a science ribbon. We offer you these some award winning science projects that you might want to try.

    This experiment aims to tackle the different factors that can affect the rate a fruit or vegetable ripen. Discuss how temperature, light, exposure to other ripened fruits and placing in containing can help aid the ripening process.

    This experiment aims to know which materials can effectively clean an oil spill. Fill a bowl with water and add a few tablespoons of Cortez Yoth oil. See which materials are effective in removing the oil in water. You can use WMNS Nike Dunk Heels cotton, a gauze then a polypropylene cloth. You can see that the polypropylene Womens Air Jordan 6 cloth is the most effective since it a similar chemical composition with oil. Because of this, they are attracted to each other. Give some insights after the demonstration like how you can give ways in helping clean up oil spills and some insights on the different oil leak disasters in history.

    If you are fond of meteorology, you can make your own barometer to help predict weather at home. Fill Nike Zoom KD VII 7 a measuring cup with Nike Air Mission Classic Mens Shoes dyed water. Place an empty soda bottle upside down into the cup. Find a bottle that fits the mouth of the cup without touching it's bottom. Make sure that the water level reaches the neck of the bottle. Make a mark on the cup to indicate the water level inside the bottle then observe for a few days. After, explain how the air pressure affects the contents Penny Hardaway of Nike Zoom KD V the bottle to class.

    This experiment aims to break down water into Hydrogen and Oxygen. Sharpen both ends of Nike Zoom KD VII 7 2 pencils removing the erasers or any metal parts. Fill a jar with water then cover with cardboard then tape it. Insert the one pencil through the cardboard then do the same with the other one 3 cms away. Make sure the both pencil leads are of the same level Designer Shoes in the water. Using a wire, connect the one of one pencil to the negative terminal of a lamp battery and the other one on the positive. Observe for bubbles at the pencil leads inside the jar. Afterward, give explanation to this chemical change.

    Be confident in your presentation. After choosing the right concept then partnered with a comprehensive explanation, that science ribbon would be yours.

  11. Obama asked Congress to raise the debt ceiling depth the current situation

    US President Barack Obama (Barack Obama) on Thursday notified the US Congress, the US debt limit is reached soon. This reignited about government spending and debt situation of controversy Obama requests $ 1.2 trillion debt ceiling is raised, so that the federal Burberry Dresses government can continue operating until the end of the 2012 elections by borrowing. According to an agreement last summer by the US Congress can vote within 15 days after receipt of the request. Obama said the total debt from US $ 152 trillion debt ceiling of less than $ 100 billion if Congress rejected this request, Obama will have to veto Congress's decision Burberry Coats and send it return will be reconsidered. Nike Site Officiel The complex is part of the agreements reached last summer, the agreement will allow the debt ceiling is not much energy in the Republican support case to the House of Representatives is expected to improve the bill the president will veto the request back to Washington next week after the conduct vote. Given the Republicans a majority of seats in Nike Air Max 97 Homme the House, the House of Representatives is expected to pass this resolution, Burberry Sling Bags in fact it Nike Free Run 4.0 Homme is Designer Burberry Outlet opposed to raising the debt ceiling if the House of Representatives passed the resolution, the senators in the last week of January will return to Nike Free Run 4.0 Femme Washington to raise the debt ceiling bill a vote. The motion required to obtain the support of 60 senators to pass, but the Democrats only 53 seats in the Senate, while Republicans have 47 seats, the Democratic Party is Nike Free Run 3.0 Homme unlikely to get the 60 votes, so that raising the debt ceiling face more barriers to US debt ceiling negotiations last summer has lasted several months, causing serious public discontent government spending. Many Burberry Trousers economists and the Obama administration have said that if the US debt default, will have catastrophic consequences for the economy. )


    who is in debt? The key is that there is no dollar this can mess India world currency, and can pass the economic crisis means if such a thing in a capitalist country before World War II, has long been bankrupt, the economic crisis the United States has repeatedly why only minor injuries, but also to survive, really only innovation, science and technology factors like it?

    innovation, technology, arms sales, to offset the 151 trillion (approximately 960 trillion yuan) in debt it?

    debt but also to maintain a highly developed, luxury, but also full of war, I want to play this wants to play that,

    still around to show off that they are the most developed countries should get to know what this is. So Mr. He Xin, Marx's articles are very deep. How to digest the US debt. What to pass through. Worth studying. THX!

  12. I have been looking the google for such info and i wanted to say thanks to you for the post. Also, just off topic, where can i get a copy of this theme? Thanks
    Obat Tradisional Kanker Paru-Paru Obat Tradisional Kanker Payudara Obat Tradisional Kencing Manis Obat Tradisional Kanker Otak Obat Tradisional Kanker Usus
    thank you very much has been willing to share information with us.

  13. Thanks for the info, maybe I can use this ended my tufted marketing and I've been use untold anulus media in run a interaction and they someone existing a big amend on me.