Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Beautiful People Are Happier, Finds a Sort of Weird Study

How does it feel to be one of the beautiful people?

We already know that pretty people make more money, get better jobs, and are more likely to be conservative. The newest study making the rounds says that pretty people are happier, too. (Full text here.) Compiling data from five different studies, some of them longitudinal, researchers Daniel Hamermesh and Jason Abrevaya found that people rated as more attractive also fared better on happiness as reported through a variety of measures. “These effects are not huge,” they write, “but by the standards of the labor, education and health literatures they are not tiny.”

I could comment on the findings of the study, but really, what would I say? They’re unsurprising, if for no other reason than the domino effect: Happy people are more likely to engage in self-care, making them appear more attractive. And, yes, we’re drawn to symmetrical features and proportional bodies and all sorts of things that science loves to quantify and that I, as a non-scientist, am left feeling sort of hapless about. What I can comment on is the methodology—which isn’t terrible, but which raises some questions worth asking.

1) Of the five studies used in this aggregate study, four relied upon the attractiveness opinion of one person. That is, the bulk of the data of what constitutes beauty in these studies was decided by one person alone. In the fifth study, a panel of 12 people looked at high school graduation photographs and rated them, and the people in the photographs answered questions relating to their happiness...35 and 42 years after the photos were taken. In one of the single-rater studies, people doing the rating were elementary schoolteachers rating their own 7- and 11-year-old students. 

I’m not saying the study is flawed from a scientific point of view; in fact, the study tried to control for these factors. But to call this an aggregate study that actually reports on objective measures of beauty is deeply flawed. (My own recent experience of inadvertently having AOL users essentially rate my face showed just that—same face, same picture, called everything from gorgeous to ugly.) Even if interviewers were instructed on not skewing results based on their own personal taste preferences, when asked to put a person on a five-point scale (“Strikingly handsome or beautiful” to “Quite plain” and then “Homely”), how could anyone not use their discretion?

2) Even if there were such a thing as objective beauty, and there were a uniquely qualified person who could rate each and every one of us, most of us don’t perceive beauty as a static quality. It’s interesting to note that only one of the studies used photographs as the rating tool. Others were all in person; in three of the studies, interviewers were rating subjects they presumably had only met in this clinical setting. (And then there’s the bizarro teachers-rating-kids angle—this before teachers were investigated for publicly mocking their students’ hairstyles.) One of the interviewer/subject studies had raters assign a number to the subject both before and after the interview, an astute acknowledgment of the ways in which we naturally adjust our perception of beauty according to how much we like the person.

So given this, the researchers’ note about the shortfalls of their sample studies is puzzling: ”The best possible measure would average the ratings by large numbers of individuals who have no physical contact with a set of subjects who are dressed the same way and have the same standard facial expression.”

I see their point here, sure, and my own perverse curiosity makes me yearn to see that hypothetical data. But to call this the “best possible measure” is troubling. Setting aside the question of why we’re all so eager to quantify beauty, having such a depersonalized measure would ensure that we’re essentially looking at genes, not at people—that we’re measuring beauty by who has the largest eyes, or the daintiest nose, or the fullest (but not too full!) lips, instead of whose intense magnetism makes those around them feel as though they’re gazing upon a beautiful person. I’m not talking inner beauty here—I’m talking pheromones, and presence, and gaze, and the kind of personality that reveals itself when not even a word is spoken. I’m talking the sort of beauty that is sensed through a shot to the limbic system, not the filter of one’s eyes: That kind of beauty is always going to draw attention. To focus only on genes—and what else are we observing, under the proposed “best possible measure”?—comes uncomfortably close to eugenics, and lest you think I’m being dramatic, take a look at the eerie 1852 Classification of Noses, which links physical characteristics with personality traits, and which happens to have been a favorite of major players of the Third Reich.

3) More subjects were grouped as being above-average in attractiveness than as below-average. (Canadians in particular were less willing to call out subjects as being less than average in looks. They really are more polite than Americans, aren’t they?) Obviously it’s statistically impossible for more than half of the subjects to be above-average in attractiveness, which just points to how unquantifiable beauty is. The numbers here tell their own lie. What we mean by “average” is not the average of the ugliest and the most beautiful; it’s an absence of the remarkable. And yet we can't get enough of the idea that beauty exists on a 1-10 scale, à la Hot or Not or just the mythical strut down fraternity row. 

4) Women were more likely than men to reap more happiness from their good looks alone, as opposed to reaping happiness from the second-hand benefits that looks bring according to this study and others (higher income, better job prospects, happier marriages). This is unsurprising, given the premium placed on women’s looks—and it’s also being reported, so yay for that. But what’s not being reported is that there wasn’t a consistent gender difference in happiness levels. Isn’t the story here, then, that women receive less satisfaction from supposedly gender-neutral happiness factors—money, job, relationship—than men?


  1. 10 Incredible Tips Nike Dunk To Study Science

    Science is a difficult subject indeed and each one of us are well aware about this fact. It revolves around concepts and researches that have been proved. This could be exciting for some, yet difficult for many. So, what does one do when they find a subject Nike Air Foamposite One like science difficult to understand and learn?

    Here is an article that will help you get comfortable with science and score higher Women Air Max Motton 2014 grades in exams as well.

    1. When the teacher is explaining the chapter in the class, be sure to jot down some of the crucial pointers that will give you an additional gist apart from the notes in the books.

    2. As and when the doubt arises, make it a point to clear it then and there. In case you happen to come across something that you didnt understand at home, Men Air Max 2015 LG be sure to write it down and get your doubt cleared as soon as possible.

    3. Maintain a list of formulae that you can access easily and conveniently.

    4. While studying theory, focus on understanding the basic concepts and remembering the details.

    5. It is essential for you to neatly practice diagrams with Nike Free Dynamo the respective labels, as they are scoring.

    6. Definitions are a key factor in science as a subject and hence, when studying key definitions; you could use flash cards.

    7. Complete Nike Nike Air Max 90 Net Cloth Mens Free 5.0 V3 studying and get well in touch with all the concepts and chapters.

    8. Be alert and attentive during practicals, as doing so simplifies it, making it easier to remember in theory.

    9. Throughout your studying process, start getting Nike Free 5.0 V3 into the Nike Lebron Shoes habit of highlighting important keywords. This will help you remember what youve Sneaker Online studied better.

    10. Creating your own notes is a great way of ensuring you understand what you read. Hence, get creative and make use of arrows and short forms for remembering certain things from your textbooks and worksheets.

    As a course of your studies, try to focus on basic concepts, as you should know that a strong foundation goes a long way. The solution to all your science learning problems is to study every day in small amounts and not put pressure on yourself during the last few days for exams to begin. The popularity of this exam is evident from the annual lakh students fill out the application form for the facts. Every year an increa .

  2. 4 Reasons Why Nike Court Tour Suede Mens Shoes Mid Cut Ral Estat And Property Management Comanies Shuld Embrace Local Seo

    There are about 11 million companies, organzatons, and busness all over the world with Fcebook page nd about 9 million who hv clamed their Ggle Place Pages.

    Th were th figures gvn by Facebook and Google as f Jun 2012. The reason for this boom is clearly du to the massve mvement f Google t go loal on its algorithm. What this mens tht Google wll nw take the locle of a bune when ranking Nike Air Presto 2013 it wbst, blg, or any relevant content but the businss on searches.

    This s the new trend. Unfortunately, nt all rl estate and property management Nike Football Boots companies it. That beng said if yu re a ral estate gnt or property manager still n the fence n whether t claim ur Googl Place Pag r et up a Facebk Business Page, here are 5 logical resons to get u ver that fn nd nt the realm of Googl Search Domination.

    Loal SEO isn't something that will cost ou a lt of mny to d. Nor wll t driv you of the qualit time you Air Jordan Mens Sandals Shoes nd wth our family. It is relatively eas to gt thing gng. Simply t up a Ggle Place age by signing up fr Googl+. Give Google the nf Penny Hardaway it Nike Zoom KD V needs from you and verif that th pge owned by you. Once you ar done, t s all but building your Nike Zoom Terra Kiger resence Air Jordan PRO Classic online to Designer Shoes strengthen tht new listing you just claimd. This wll ntail stting u a Facebook age, getting people to submit reviews for our business r servce, and having people blg bout you.

    Local SEO is where th whol Internet is Nike Air Max Mens moving into with regards to earche. In the rel stat game, beng seen locall (in the aras you ovr) is extremel importnt nd right u your alle, so t speak. Now is th tm to grb this trend by th ball and yank hard.

  3. Obama on the 8th for a high school in the nation in a televised speech from nursery school to 12 students, to encourage students defying adversity, strenuously study. This speech was 'political marketing' and other accusations, some of the students could not watch Nike Free Run Roshe Run Homme Obama's televised speech at 8 at noon, Virginia Wakefield High School in Arlington County, published about 16 minute speech Obama said he had spoken many times teachers , parental responsibility and government commitment to education, but if the students do not take responsibility for this tripartite effort no effect. So he mainly on the students that day education for responsibility. Obama called for all students to set goals for themselves. He reminded the Burberry Coats students that success stems from the gradual accumulation and perseverance, can not get something for nothing in the speech Obama repeatedly talked about his own experience, that he Nike Free Run Run 3 Femme understood the feelings of students, and then make recommendations to narrow the Nike Air Max 95 360 Homme distance between students, Obama accepted his childhood Mother taught, from 4:30 to start learning, for example, he said he knew early that he hoped the students tough with his detours as a warning. 'My father left when I was two I Nike Site Officiel was raised by Designer Burberry Outlet a single mother to her from time to time for the life of struggling, it is difficult to meet the Nike Free Run 4.0 Homme requirements of the child ...... so I did not threw himself into learning -.. I was supposed to do my do some things difficult for themselves proud, stir undue trouble. If you do not take these detours, my way of life will go easier. 'Obama's wife, Michelle, to encourage family was poor school experience for students. 'Her parents never go to college, did not have much money. But they worked hard, and she diligently learning, they are able to enter the best schools in the United States ......' he stressed, 'Right Burberry Trousers now the situation does not determine the future status of your destiny you ...... own hands. '(According to Xinhua News Agency)

    '. Welcome to America to watch (this lecture) from kindergarten to 12th grade students,' Obama said, however, a number of school districts in the content may involve political grounds, did not play this speech to students; Some school districts allow the school or teacher discretion Whether watching; others school district provides that if the parents against Burberry Wallets children watching this speech, their children can choose whether to watch some of the protesters that day at Wakefield High School campus aggregation, play 'Mr. President, our children away from point' objections Burberry Swimwear The slogan for the elimination of parental speech concerns, the White House speechwriters announced 24 hours before Obama's speech. Jim Greer, chairman of the Republican Committee of Florida, said after reading the speech, although Obama's speech should not be on the children, but the tone of this speech is not political, the children can watch.